![]() I disagree with the other poster that Krita is complicated to understand sometimes, I actually have a significantly harder time understanding Photoshop than Krita and with good reason, Photoshop is bloated to the brim with features I do not use, and never will. And corel painter simply ain't aimed at vector use even if it is capable of it. GIMP would be more than sufficient if you can handle it's terrible, hideous, horrendous UI design. But you can say that GIMP and Krita are the only ones that work on linux, they are also the only ones that are free, and despite being free they are able to compete with the other (quite expensive) choices.įor logo design you might want to look at something completely different, like vector drawing programs (such as Inkscape, Illustrator, Flash, Corel Draw.) Krita is out of all the 3 main programs I'm discussing by far the worst at handling vectors, so if you intend to use vectors then Krita would be your worst choice. There are differences between the programs, you can not say 1 program is better than the other for any of the 4 programs. ![]() Krita focuses on being a painting program but doubles as an image editor as well, Corel Painter focuses on being a painting program, Photoshop focuses on being an image editor but doubles as a painting program and GIMP fills that same category as Photoshop as well. What Photoshop could be compared to is GIMP. Krita is more easily compared to Corel Painter. The thing is that the programs are in large part incomparable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |